Skip main navigation
The Brooklyn Museum

Collections: Asian Art

Showing objects 1 - 50 of 218Next

Tale of the Wisteria RobeEvening Shower at Nihonbashi Bridge, from Celebrated Places in the Eastern Capital (Toto Meisho)Dragon JarCrouching BearLokhapala on a Recumbent BullPortrait of Thakur Sangram SinghPillow with Incised DecorationGyosai Kadan Nihen (Pictorial Accounts of Gyosai), Part II, Volume 3Small Model of Bullock or Humped OxCovered Funeral VaseDrying Fishnets in the Four SeasonsKo-Kutani DishMirrorMaharana Jawan Singh of Mewar Receiving the Governor General of India, Lord William Cavendish Bentinck, February 8th, 1832Fragment of Broad Shallow VesselShang VaseEwer (Zhihu)Wall Hanging (Kalamkari)Standing YakusaSeated MaitreyaNihonbashiSocketed Tube CouplerWomans RobeZumurrud Shah Takes Refuge in the MountainsInfinity II (Shinso)Scene from the Tale of GenjiShang VaseWine Jar with Eight ImmortalsStanding Figure of Buddhist GuardianLingaBeauties of the Latest Fashion Compared with the Beauty of Flowers (Tosei Bijin), from Flower Playing Cards (Hana-awase)VajraFolio from a Gandavyuha ManuscriptVaseVessel in the Form of a Mythological AnimalMale Figure Riding Horse, One of PairSaddle OrnamentsParvatiPlateFemale TorsoPair of Crossbow MountsGyosai Kadan Nihen (Pictorial Accounts of Gyosai), Part I, Volume 2Two Women on a TerraceGyosai Kadan Nihen (Pictorial Accounts of Gyosai), Part I, Volume 1TeapotTraveling CofferWater Jar (Yu)Siddha Lakhsmi with KaliRabbit 98-06Belavala Ragini, Page from a Dispersed Ragamala Series

Showing objects 1 - 50 of 218Next


Recent Blog Posts

Purchasing a Major Work of Art for the Collection - part VII I can’t believe that it’s been more than a year since my last posting on this topic. I guess I got distracted by other tasks. I was recently read more...

close

Purchasing a Major Work of Art for the Collection - part VII

Joan Cummins on January 6, 2009
I can’t believe that it’s been more than a year since my last posting on this topic. I guess I got distracted by other tasks. I was recently asked to “wrap it up,” so here it goes…

In my first installment, I mentioned that no curator shops alone. The official process for adding an object to a museum collection really underscores that idea. It’s that final process, known as “accessioning,” that I’m going to talk about here.

2007.2_PS2.jpg

Shiva as Chandrashekhara. Southern India. Chola period, c. 970 A.D. Bronze. Height 25 in. Brooklyn Museum. Gift of the Asian Art Council and other donors in honor of Amy G. Poster, 2007.2.

After we were offered the Shiva by a well-known New York dealer, I had a few people join me on a visit to his workspace to see the object. In our group were the curator emeritus whom the object was going to honor, the co-Chairs of the group of supporters who were largely responsible for funding the purchase, the former Chair of the group (who happens to know a great deal about Indian sculpture), and our senior object conservator (Lisa Bruno, a fellow Brooklyn Museum blogger). All of us were looking for different things, especially the conservator, who wanted to make sure the Shiva wasn’t actively deteriorating and who was looking for signs of major repair or tampering that might have compromised the authenticity of the object.

Once the Shiva passed all our criteria, we told the dealer to “hold” the piece for us and we asked for photographs. I rushed back to our Director, Deputy Director, and Chief Curator and showed them the photos while also making a pitch for why the object would make such a good addition to the collection, how we could use it in various different types of exhibitions, why it was an appropriate acquisition to honor Amy, etc. They seemed impressed. Had they not been impressed, it would have been pretty difficult for me to move forward with the purchase. I have had directors reject objects that I really, really wanted, and while it seemed terribly unfair and somewhat arbitrary at the time one has to remember that the Director has broad experience and really is just looking out for the wellbeing of the Museum.

Only after I got their go-ahead did I arrange for the object to come to the Museum. We generally try not to have works of art delivered to the Museum unless we are quite sure that we want them. The Museum usually has to foot the bill for returning the objects we decide not to acquire, and packing and shipping of works of art can get pretty expensive.

After the object arrived at the Museum, it received further inspections by conservators and administrators while I generated the official paperwork to present it to our Collections Committee. Most art museums have a Collections Committee, comprised of members of the Board of Trustees and sometimes other high-ranking constituents. The Committee is tasked with keeping the Museum on track with the kind, quality, and number of objects it acquires (and disposes -- more on that later). The Committee looks at gifts as well as purchases.

The curators and Director wouldn’t present anything to the Collections Committee without a strong sense that it should be added to the collection, but the Committee is there as a final check on the Museum staff, to make sure that we haven’t overlooked a serious problem with the object or the terms of its acquisition. They meet several times a year to look at, and vote on, the latest batch of acquisitions. Only after the Committee has voted can an object be added officially to the collection.

After the Collections Committee meeting, and only after the meeting, the Museum cuts a check for the vendor. Sometimes—often—many months pass between the day the curator first expresses interest in a work of art and the day the dealer receives any money for it. Dealers are willing to put up with the delay because of the prestige of having sold an object to a museum. But there are certainly situations in which a Museum loses out on an object because a private collector can pay for it on the spot and the dealer really needs the cash.

shiva_install.jpg

Designer Lance Singletary works with Brooklyn Museum Art Handlers to install Shiva as Chandrashekhara.

After the object has been approved by the Committee, it is assigned an accession number (you’ll notice these associated with all of Brooklyn’s objects; they start with a 2-digit or 4-digit date) and a location in storage. In an ideal world we would put all our new acquisitions out on view immediately after they arrive, but installing works of art in a public gallery costs quite a bit of money. Sculptures often need mounts made, pedestals built, etc. It seems kind of tacky, but sometimes we have to tell a potential donor that we can’t accept their work of art as a gift unless they also give us the cash to pay for its installation. Museum casework has to ensure proper climate and security, and an apparently simple pedestal with a Plexiglas bonnet can cost several thousand dollars. Luckily, we already had a pedestal in the Indian gallery that was just right for our Shiva, and he didn’t need any fancy mount because his base sits flat and steady. So we moved him into the gallery shortly after we acquired him and we don’t have any plans to move him in the future, so he’s probably there right now.

A final word on the accessioning process: it is slow, involves a lot of paperwork, and requires the efforts of dozens of individuals, but it is designed to make sure that we are serious, cautious, and deliberate in our intake of art objects. Every art museum (there may be one or two exceptions) has junk in storage. The majority of it was given, rather than purchased. Often the curator knew or suspected it was junk but accepted it anyway because they didn’t want to offend the donor. There’s something to be said for cultivating long-term relationships with donors, but storage space is finite and we’re supposed to treat all objects with a very high level of care that can be a burden on the budget and staff time. So nowadays we are pretty hardcore about what we accept. And like most museums, we do some deaccessioning, or removal of objects from the collection.

Probably most of you have read news stories criticizing museums for selling off great works of art from their collections. What you don’t hear about is the far greater number of not-so-great works of art that leave museum collections. And you also don’t hear just how much work museums have to put into the process of releasing objects, many of which will fetch three figures on a good day. We have numerous people from several sectors sign off on the release (including the Collections Committee), we put considerable effort into finding appropriate homes for the objects in other public institutions, and then if we do sell we prefer to do so at auction so the transaction can be as public as possible even though an auction might not be the most lucrative venue for sale. In short, deaccessioning is a laborious and mostly unrewarding process and the aim of the curator is to take in as few future deaccessions as possible.

shiva_gallery.jpg

Let’s not end this long series on a grim note! Instead, please let me encourage you to visit the Asian Art galleries, on the second floor of the Brooklyn Museum. We’re gradually getting more and more of the collection out onto the web, but really nothing beats seeing the objects in person. One of the great things about an in-person visit to a museum is the happy accidents—you go to see a specific show or work of art but you catch sight of something you’ve never seen or heard of before and it becomes the thing you remember, the object that changes your outlook in some way. So come visit our Shiva, and maybe you’ll find some other works of art that are even more exciting.

go to the original blog post...

close

Last chance to catch our Add-Art show! Last week I blogged about our participation in Add-Art, the plug-in for Firefox that blocks ads and replaces them with art. We just got an e-mail from Steve Lambert read more...

close

Last chance to catch our Add-Art show!

Shelley Bernstein on June 2, 2008
Last week I blogged about our participation in Add-Art, the plug-in for Firefox that blocks ads and replaces them with art. We just got an e-mail from Steve Lambert reporting that Add-Art has been downloaded thousands of times since the launch which means our 100 Views of Edo show is getting seen in browsers across the globe. Our show runs through this Wednesday (June 4), so download now and install to catch it. Steve's got a great roster of upcoming curators and it should be fun to see what comes next.

Need help installing or just want a better idea of what all this is about? Check out this tutorial from Steve:

Introduction to Add-Art from Steve Lambert on Vimeo.

go to the original blog post...

close

Mashing-up Hiroshige to block ads and Add-Art! What in the world am I talking about?? Brooklyn-based artist Steve Lambert has developed a plug-in for the Firefox browser that block ads and replaces them with art. There's read more...

close

Mashing-up Hiroshige to block ads and Add-Art!

Shelley Bernstein on May 22, 2008
What in the world am I talking about?? Brooklyn-based artist Steve Lambert has developed a plug-in for the Firefox browser that block ads and replaces them with art. There's a lot more about Add-Art (and how great it is) over at C-Monster's blog, so I won't recap here.

We caught up with Steve about a year ago in the comments on the Walker's post about the application and mentioned the Museum would be interested in contributing images to the project. Steve has been updating us with progress reports and then, a month ago, suggested we curate a show for the launch.

Add-Art shows are made up of 8 individual works at 15 different sizes. We needed to present a selection of collection works that would look good in all these different sizes knowing the plugin would randomly present the images depending on what ad space it was attempting to block. Hiroshige's prints are detailed enough to create interesting crops and are already online, so they seemed a natural choice for this project. Joan Cummins, our Lisa and Bernard Selz Curator of Asian Art selected the 8 prints...

30.1478.30_PS1.jpg 30.1478.56_PS1.jpg 30.1478.58_PS1.jpg 30.1478.64_PS1.jpg

30.1478.65_PS1.jpg 30.1478.89_PS1.jpg 30.1478.94_PS1.jpg 30.1478.112_PS1.jpg

...and here's what the Hiroshige mash-up looks like for the Add-Art application.

Add-Art publicly releases today (May 22) and there is a panel discussion at the New Museum this evening. Congrats to Steve and the team and thanks for letting us take part in this great app! Instructions for installing are on the Add-Art site.

go to the original blog post...

close

read all Asian Art blog posts

Join the posse or log in to work with our collection. Your tags, comments, and favorites will display with your attribution.

Recent Comments

"I'm still confused by the title derive in the article and the name of the piece on the floor?"
by robert newmark

"this is sic yo "
by mike jones

"i am thrilled that this exists."
by paul

Recently Tagged Objects

Folio from a Gandavyuha Manuscript was tagged "12th century"
by ninakuriloff

Small Toy Whistle was tagged "baked clay"
by ninakuriloff

Small Toy Whistle was tagged "Pakistan"
by ninakuriloff


more
history Collection History
Highlights
all
Long-Term Installations
Tags in Asian Artall
Artistsall
Exhibitionsall